What I posted was that there had been reports at the time with the event as I posted. Those reports did happen, so my post was not false.
Those reports, according to your expert opinion were false. That works for me, as I offered no personal opinion on the reports validity,
I was merely observing that the reports had been published and posted on FreeRepublic.
OK, fair enough. Your post looked like a pretty strong endorsement of those reports and that you disagreed with the "squashing" of those "short-lived" reports that indicated the only "passengers" were dead bodies. Why else post these theories unless you were convinced it was true?
If it was me, and if I didn't believe it, I'd try to make that clear.