You are, certainly, with your individual copy. What these companies did was to alter content without the permission of the copyright holder, for resale purposes. Paying for a copy of the original doesn't cover the businesses in this case, since permission was never obtained.
You are, certainly, with your individual copy. What these companies did was to alter content without the permission of the copyright holder, for resale purposes. Paying for a copy of the original doesn't cover the businesses in this case, since permission was never obtained. If the two actions of:
- Buying a legal copy of a movie
- Editing that copy for content, or paying a business to do it for you
...are both legal, then why is it a violation of copyright law to perform both actions at the same time, and with the same company?