Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bvw
why then the regularization of the spelling of words can be both copyrighted and patent.

Words and the spelling of them are facts, and facts can't be copyrighted (see Feist v. Rural Tel. Service Co., 1991). Creative organization and layout, plus comments and the specific wording of definition go into a dictionary, which make the work as a whole copyrighted.

Patents don't apply unless you have a specific unique method for creating a dictionary.

465 posted on 07/11/2006 9:57:24 PM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 455 | View Replies ]


To: antiRepublicrat
The regularized spelling of words is a business process. Patenable.

Moreover just as Kleenex and Jello were nonsense words before their invention as brand names, so too was spelling so irregular prior to Wabster's artifact that the regular use of a particular spelling was no "fact".

466 posted on 07/12/2006 4:25:29 AM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 465 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson