[bigdcaldavis]

The judge made the right decision. It is clearly a copyright violation to edit a movie and sell the edited movie without the permission of that movie's copyright owner. If you don't want you or your kids to see such content, just don't allow it in the home at all. Parents who rely on such things just give credence to the nanny state's argument of "We know what's best for your kids better than you do".

[Gabz]

If you don't want you or your kids to see such content, just don't allow it in the home at all. Parents who rely on such things just give credence to the nanny state's argument of "We know what's best for your kids better than you do".

Preceisely.

[Hendrix]

"Parents who rely on such things just give credence to the nanny state's argument of "We know what's best for your kids better than you do".

What a silly argument you made. Of course the parents know that profanity, nudity, etc. is bad for their kids. If the parents want to choose to shield their kids from such stuff (as they have done since the beginning of time), then they should have the right to do so. The nanny state refers to the government imposing its own views--not parents.