Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Borges
However the company in question is profiting from making alterations that, in the view of the creators, alters the essence of the product.

That argument doesn't ring true to me either, since these studios regularly edit their movies for content so they may be shown on network television.

118 posted on 07/10/2006 9:05:11 AM PDT by TChris (Banning DDT wasn’t about birds. It was about power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]


To: TChris

That's right. The studios are doing it, with their content, in their way. They have the rights to that content.


123 posted on 07/10/2006 9:06:24 AM PDT by linda_22003
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies ]

To: TChris

Studios certainly lose the argument in principal because they allow changes in those other venues. But the fact remains that its their right to grant permission.


124 posted on 07/10/2006 9:06:47 AM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson