To: Brilliant
I don't blame them, but they had better have the a-bomb before they make this decision.
2 posted on
07/10/2006 5:35:32 AM PDT by
Brilliant
To: Brilliant
I don't blame them, but they had better have the a-bomb before they make this decision.
And they should have it, frankly. Look, it's been 60 years: the war's over. A nuclear Japan would be a serious restraint on the Norks and any hotheads in the government in Beijing.
7 posted on
07/10/2006 5:44:06 AM PDT by
JamesP81
("Never let your schooling interfere with your education" --Mark Twain)
To: Brilliant
I don't really consider it "pre-emptive" though. Someone shoots at me and misses and I'm going to give them a second chance?
12 posted on
07/10/2006 5:51:24 AM PDT by
sageb1
(This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
To: Brilliant
Me thinks they have at least the elements in place for a bomb
To: Brilliant
The Japanese are fools if they do not obtain a nuclear deterrent. It is time to revise their terms of surrender from WWII, that prevents them from acquiring a nuclear force. The Japanese are our allies and can be trusted.
22 posted on
07/10/2006 6:57:45 AM PDT by
cpdiii
(Socialism is popular with the ruling class. It gives legitimacy to tyranny and despotism.)
To: Brilliant
I don't blame them, but they had better have the a-bomb before they make this decision.Didn't we already give them two?
34 posted on
07/10/2006 1:10:45 PM PDT by
SlowBoat407
(What is our exit strategy in the war on poverty?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson