Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: stuck_in_new_orleans
and how dare you take someons work and then edit it and then turn around and SELL it to make a profit.

Think they were renting it, not selling it. They were paying the royalities to the proper people (royalities that otherwise would not of been made).. but changing it they were.. some have suggested that they actually put the actual unedited copy and the cleaned version in the same package (I don't know about the double version to be honest, that would be interesting to know if it was true)..

What these companies were not doing was taking the artist's work without compensation... compensation was paid in the form of movie royalities as required.

13 posted on 07/09/2006 9:21:07 PM PDT by LowOiL ("I am neither . I am a Christocrat" - Benjamin Rush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: LowOiL
What these companies were not doing was taking the artist's work without compensation... compensation was paid in the form of movie royalities as required

that doesnt give you the right to alter their work.

15 posted on 07/09/2006 9:23:58 PM PDT by stuck_in_new_orleans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson