Sediment can only make sedimentary or conglomerate rock. Stop treating people that are beyond your level like fools. We've all got your number here; always pulling some kind of scam. Sorry, I have found that your "science" is simply not to be trusted. It seems to be a function of your religious belief, not your scientific investigations.
I once asked for documentation of your claims about a "global" flood, which you said was supported by some formations in the lower Central Valley of California or somewhere close. You never provided any documentation. (I have worked in that area, and I didn't find evidence of a large-scale, global-type, flood.)
All you seem to provide are short, often sarcastic, comments which seem to go against mainstream science, but which you don't -- or can't -- support. Until you can support your comments, how can I evaluate or trust any of them?
(Enjoy the sunrise--this one is from South Africa.)
Sediment can only make sedimentary or conglomerate rock. I take it you're not a believer in that god-hating, soul-destroying, anti-American "Theory of Metamorphic Rocks"? I'm surprised the Discovery Institute isn't filing lawsuits against petrography classes.
Sediment can only make sedimentary or conglomerate rock. Stop treating people that are beyond your level like fools. We've all got your number here; always pulling some kind of scam. What is marble, O beyond-my-level one?
None of the ways in which you are beyond my level are at all admirable. I am not the one who is misrepresenting the content of mainstream geology on this thread. You have misrepresented what mountains are and what the evidence is from old sediment layers. Now you are misrepresenting what can happen to sediments.
You may disagree with mainstream geology, obvoiusly. However, while anyone is entitled to his own interpretation, he is not entitled to his own facts.
The oldest "sediments" are very rare and often are too metamorphosed to contain discernible fossils, although their isotope signatures may point to life having been present. Look up "metamorphic" sometime.
Despite multiple lines of evidence for a 4.5 gigayear age of the Earth, for a long time the oldest detected lithospheric rock was 3.8 billion. (I think very recently that has been upped to about 4 billion even.) Very little indeed is around from more than three gigayears ago. Immediately Precambrian rocks still aren't very common, although that's only half a gig back. The scarcity or abundance of a given age of rock is a function of that age. That's the picture you expect when the old ones are getting eaten.
Subduction is the answer. We know it happens. It has already eaten most of the oldest rocks on Earth.
In a YEC model, the old ones wouldn't exist at all. Everything would in fact be about the same age, radiometrically, which is younger than springtime. There wouldn't be anything in the world anywhere (if it came from living things) which wouldn't be datable by C14.
Now, that's a creation model making scientific, falsifiable predictions. Hooray!! The only problem is, all the predictions have long ago been falsified.