To: ClaireSolt
"... They made no plutonium under Clinton"What possible justification would they have for making a statement like that? And what justification could the media have for letting one of the Clintonistas get away with making such a statement without a closed fist smack down?
Outrageous!
This is why I wish Brit would do these interviews or, better yet, explicitely critique them during the roundtable or on his show during the week.
Say! That's an idea. Why don't we start sending Brit emails at his Special Report show email address asking him to critique specific questions and answers from the Sunday shows?
We could start with this one.
539 posted on
07/09/2006 1:24:09 PM PDT by
Phsstpok
(Often wrong, but never in doubt)
To: Phsstpok
I just realized that no one even bothered to comment about Juan Williams' contribution to the panel this week. It was too lame to waste keyboard strokes on.
542 posted on
07/09/2006 1:35:28 PM PDT by
maica
(Things may come to those who wait, but only the things left by those who hustle --Abraham Lincoln)
To: Phsstpok
I don't know enough nuclear science is Platonium the only way to get a bomb? It would be typical Clintonite tactics to be technically factual by making a disingenuous statement. Maybe he did not "make plutonium" then but he sure built his bomb during the Clinton regime.
551 posted on
07/09/2006 1:48:40 PM PDT by
MNJohnnie
(Fire Murtha Now! Spread the word. Support Diana Irey. http://www.irey.com/)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson