Posted on 07/09/2006 5:06:16 AM PDT by Alas Babylon!
I need a list of every treasonous story... I don't care if it's Blair or NSA... all of them. I could also use their responses to the ethics involved... whether Seagal Committee, change in their written code or rebuttals published after criticized.
That's what it looks lke ali did a link.
I could also use a list of every statement (shows, A/V and columns), made by him after the exposures. Especially NSA/SWIFT.
Don't even start with the incestuous situation of the Times pushing an agenda for a reporter's upcoming book.
Oops, sleuth, I see that in THIS post you correctly say "Hayden". I was responding to the one where you used Hadley instead of Hayden. Were you by any chance quoting someone else then?
#417, Savor every post, this has been another great thread. I see a lot of new Sunday thread posters that really are up to the character and intelligence gathering and spot on commentary that we all know and love. Hey drive by media eat our dust.....
We tried to get it out before... his antics in Florida as well as the port authority... Chuckie having no problem with certain folks there. Levin tried to get it out there... hey... the MSM.
Just so long as no one puts that information to practical use...
... except maybe in downtown Tehran or perhaps Mecca...
I got the part about how we caught a terror type and then sent him to a Egypt for a little "non-PC, in-depth interviewing" and the Italians got pissed--too bad!
We are in a WOT and the other side just chops off heads, get with the program idiots.
#421, can anybody in that town keep their ^^$@$^#&((@*&#%!^ mouth shut?
Actually, she is supporting him in the primary. What struck everyone was that she oddly and unnecessarily went on to say that she would back the winner of the primary, whoever that was. Playing both ends against the middle, I guess.
ref #423, I think his book and several statements he has made in the last year made me totally change my opinion of Giggles Napolitano.
Is this guy really a Republicans whose side is he on, what a dud.
Great link, AV...
Yes,...I see where the WaPo inserted "domestic" into their story..when it wasn't in Hoekstra's letter...I wonder if THEIR source told them is was domestic...or they are just saying that to get the Administration in more trouble??
I also found it interesting that in his letter, Hoekstra was more concerned with his and his fellow Congresscritter's egos...than whether Bush is breaking the law, by not informing them on some programs....LOL
#430, and what tune would that be? I think that I would like to hear The Days of "Whine" and Roses sung by Jack Murtha with Mother Sheehan and Howeird Dean as backup singers.
#436, they are better now thanks to plenty of hot soapy dishwater, and keeping those suckers moving.
You may be right about Putin..but I thought I read that at this time, he isn't planning on running again..but, I am a lot more wrong than you are.
BTW..Fox had the results of one of their polls today..that showed for the Republican candidate for POTUS in 2008...
McCain and Rudy are the only ones with double digit percentage of voters..
McCain first, Rudy second...but, what caught MY eye was that even Bill Frist had a higher percentage than George Allen..who had 4%, I believe...Newt beat him also.
Allen is having a hard Senate race...so, I guess that accounts for it...but, it doesn't look good.
Note: NONE of the top ones are very conservative.
Re: Julian's remarks that seemed to have been the last straw...I think he did read a letter from a family member who's in Iraq, he does seem to be for cutting and running and he did talk a lot about his gas guzzler.
But I think I recall, unless I dreamed it, that he took up for the horrible people who disrupt funerals of our war dead by waving signs and screaming that because of homosexualitys acceptance in America their loved one was allowed to be killed by God to punish America for its sins. They scream things like God hates fags and they're looking forward to more dead soldiers until America repents.
Not that Julian agreed with them at all, but I believe he sided with their right to do this and said something like, "Whatever happened to free speech?"
I could be mixing this up with another event so if anyone knows this to be wrong, please correct me.
This is classic Hillary. She actually has 3 different factions to try and please. Triangulate has taken on new meaning with her and her "chase for the Presidency".
1. She has to please the Moonbat Wing (and there are many) of the Democrat Party, therefore her announcement of non-support for Lieberman if he loses the primary.
2. She must try and please the Moderate Wing (what few is left) of the Democrat Party, therefore she supports Lieberman in the primary.
3. She must try and move toward the "middle" of the idealogical spectrum and likely voters, therefore she supports the war (to a moderate degree), but continuously speaks of Bush doing a horrendous job conducting it.
She may just have a nervous breakdown trying to balance all these positions.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.