[editor-surveyor]

"If you have a single piece of evidence that actually supports Darwin, I'd love to see it."

Stand back as the propagandists post their colorful, irrelevant, blacklight photographed monkey skulls for the 10,001st time. :o)

[Coyoteman]

Stand back as the propagandists post their colorful, irrelevant, blacklight photographed monkey skulls for the 10,001st time. :o)

You missed four nice skulls that I already posted. Keep looking downthread from #20.

But if you want to see that nice photo again, I have included it below. By the way, can you tell me which of these images are the monkeys?

(And if they were truly "irrelevant" why are you moaning so much about them?)

Figure 1.4.4. Fossil hominid skulls. Some of the figures have been modified for ease of comparison (only left-right mirroring or removal of a jawbone). (Images © 2000 Smithsonian Institution.)

(A) Pan troglodytes, chimpanzee, modern
(B) Australopithecus africanus, STS 5, 2.6 My
(C) Australopithecus africanus, STS 71, 2.5 My
(D) Homo habilis, KNM-ER 1813, 1.9 My
(E) Homo habilis, OH24, 1.8 My
(F) Homo rudolfensis, KNM-ER 1470, 1.8 My
(G) Homo erectus, Dmanisi cranium D2700, 1.75 My
(H) Homo ergaster (early H. erectus), KNM-ER 3733, 1.75 My
(I) Homo heidelbergensis, "Rhodesia man," 300,000 - 125,000 y
(J) Homo sapiens neanderthalensis, La Ferrassie 1, 70,000 y
(K) Homo sapiens neanderthalensis, La Chappelle-aux-Saints, 60,000 y
(L) Homo sapiens neanderthalensis, Le Moustier, 45,000 y
(M) Homo sapiens sapiens, Cro-Magnon I, 30,000 y
(N) Homo sapiens sapiens, modern