[CarolinaGuitarman]

"Ahhhhh, so we now get to the crux of the liberal argument -- if you can't prove it's wrong, it is, by definition, true."

Uh, no. The crux of the issue is you have not provided anything that shows evolution to be a *fiction*; all you have done is restate your claim and throw ad hominem attacks.

Why should I accept your claim against the evidence I provided you? Are you just incapable of critiquing it?

[vetsvette]

"Are you just incapable of critiquing it?"

Critiquing anyone's articles of religious faith is a waste of effort --

The absence of any fossil record support for where the innumerable species that spontaneously appear during the Cambrian Period could possibly have "evolved" is the mother of all "gaps" in Darwin's theory - a gap that your wish bias will not close.

If you would rather believe in Darwin than in some higher being, have at it -- I can't criticize your religious preference. Just don't pretend that it's science, rather than faith that you're arguing for.