Replies

"Through your ad hominen attacks,..."

You can't be seriously accusing ME of using ad hominems after your little rant about *Darwiniacs*, can you? You really ARE hilarious!

"I looked at your reference and wasn't even a little impressed. "

I'm not surprised. I also know you didn't actually read more than 1% of it, as you didn't have time to read it and answer so quickly.

"You see, I also have a terminal credential in one of the hard sciences and lesser degree's in two others, so I do understand the scientific method."

No, you really don't understand it. Your understanding does seem to be *terminal* though, I'll argee with you there.

"Darwin argued that modern species "evolved" from different and more primitive species."

And the evidence backs that wonderfully.

"Now, given the billions of modern species and a huge fossil record to work with, a logical person would believe that there is, somewhere in the fossil record, a demonstration of this amazing phenomenon."

Here's a hint: That link I gave you provided numerous examples of such evidence.

"All I asked from you was just one example and you've not presented it. "

That's a *misstatement*.

"You give me instead, a fellow believer's treatise on scientific method."

Again, you actually have to READ the material; just clicking onto the link isn't enough.

"You remind me of a moonbat that called in to a radio talk show a while ago."

No ad hominems from you, nope... lol

"Okay -- where is the one fossil record example that demonstrates a modern species "evolved" from a different, more primitive, species. Saying that "the entire fossil record supports that conclusion makes me think that maybe you're that radio caller in disguise."

I already gave you the evidence. It's up to you to look at it or not.

So far you have provided no argument against evolution. Nothing.