Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: durasell

LOL! Okee Dokee, then.

A better question might be this: if you truly object to the content of a film, why would you watch a sanitized version of it? What's the point of objecting in the first place? The original content has not gone away just because you skipped over it. This reminds me of vegetarians who eat food that tastes like meat. Makes no sense to me.


460 posted on 07/09/2006 12:58:21 PM PDT by ShandaLear (Gringos Unite!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 457 | View Replies ]


To: ShandaLear

Figure a movie like Chicago that has a rather graphic sex scene at the beginning or a movie like Titanic in which breasts are revealed briefly. In both cases the offending material could be deleted without seriously compromising the movie.

The other issue, which is rarely discussed, is that not all movies are for kids. Should we have just movies that are suitable for children? That would eliminate a helluva lot of good movies.


463 posted on 07/09/2006 1:03:07 PM PDT by durasell (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 460 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson