In other words, you made a statement that is not grounded in any fact, it's just something you made up.
But anyway, here you go:
Federal copyright law:
http://www.copyright.gov/title17/circ92.pdf
Utah copyright law:
http://le.utah.gov/~code/code.htm
Click on "Search by keyword", then enter "copyright", click the search button and there you are.
There are no local copyright laws in Utah.
LO!! You're a funny person. You have asked everyone on this thread the exact same question refined with an alternate analogy, including magic marker, replacing words, editing content, censoring, form editing, airline version versus retail, defacing, you name it, blah blah blah and you want another answer to the same question pulled from a legal document that you have not come close to understanding but if the framework isn't just right, you will re-frame the same question?
Now you want a legal answer so you can probably re-frame a point of law verbiage and again ask the same question.
Take a legal course or try to comprehend everything said to you by numerous posters.
Ultimately, everyone answered your questions as posed. But you rejected all of them and asked the same question again, so, I'm wrong, you're right, laws are too complicated and authors works don't matter. Points of law are immaterial to personal desires and most likely wouldn't penetrate your mindset.
PS: Read you links, comprehend it and try again. Educating you is not my lifes work.
Good Morning. :-)