To: Strategerist
Ok, so someone buys 1000 copies of the Passion of the Christ, adds in scenes of Christ uttering profanities and having sex, sells them, but destroys the originals. Fine with you I presume.
I see nothing wrong with that. If our current law prohibits that (and we'll see how the higher courts rule), then it should be changed. I should be free to edit any movie I buy in any way I like and to resell that copy. [Not change it and then make mass copies of that copy mind you (aka, a form of pirating). For each video I resold I'd have to buy an original from the studio and physically alter it. That seems like the proper balance to me.] These people, likewise, are buying movies from the companies, editing them, and then selling them. You can still buy Studio ____'s version of the movie from the studio itself. None of this diminishes the studio's profits, in fact, it may increase them.
116 posted on
07/08/2006 11:19:48 PM PDT by
NinoFan
To: NinoFan
Great explanation that Nino himself would be proud of.
There's no legal issue here other than the willfulness of a judge.
670 posted on
07/10/2006 1:10:28 AM PDT by
mjolnir
("All great change in America begins at the dinner table.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson