Fills a need????
You can't honestly think anything that requires sanitizing needs viewing? If you do, you're giving a pass to the smut, the producer and financier for the selfish sake of your own enjoyment and you're tricking the very market place conservatives rely on to meter that market.
You can't honestly think anything that requires sanitizing needs viewing?
I meant fills a need in the marketplace. Obviously the company wasn't sanitizing the films for kicks. They were making money off the process.
No film "needs" viewing. No book "needs" reading. And no song "needs" to be heard. But we still watch movies, read books and listen to music.
That said, there are many movies worth watching that may offend some folks. For the easily offended, why not provide them with an option?