Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Calling The Bluff On North Korea
Space War ^ | Jul 06, 2006 | Claude Salhani UPI Editor

Posted on 07/08/2006 7:05:19 PM PDT by Ben Mugged

North Korea may have gambled -- and lost -- while playing a game of nuclear/missile chicken with the United States. The reclusive communist state, the only remaining Stalinist regime on the planet, can hardly feed its population. Thousands are reported to starve to death every winter, yet this has not prevented Pyongyang from spending billions of dollars to build a nuclear deterrent, and a delivery system it hopes would reach the continental United States.

~Snip~ This latest move by North Korea will give the United States a golden opportunity to step up its military presence in and around the Pacific area. Following this latest North Korean stunt, Washington should find it relatively easy in convincing Tokyo for the need to strengthen military cooperation between the United States and Japan.

As one analyst put it, Japan could well become the England of the Pacific -- an island fortress and a staunch ally of the United States who sees its own security and well being tied-in to a strong -- and permanent -- American presence in the Pacific region.

Similarly, the Bush administration will make certain to stress the dangers associated with North Korea's missile maneuvers, playing up the fact that Pyongyang is now within reach of Alaska, Hawaii and possibly even the west coast of the continental United States.

Luckily for North Korea their missile test flunked. But assume for a moment that the North Koreans had succeeded; that, in and of itself, would not necessarily mean there is suddenly any real and present danger to the security of the United States given the tremendous imbalance of power between the two countries.

(Excerpt) Read more at spacewar.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: geopolitics; ilcommunication; littlekim; northkorea; proliferation
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last
Read the entire article. Very well thought out with some excellent points.
1 posted on 07/08/2006 7:05:21 PM PDT by Ben Mugged
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ben Mugged

"But North Korea's bluff may have been a blunder. The Bush administration will make a point to stress the dangers associated with this latest North Korean proliferation, playing up the fact that Pyongyang is now within reach of the west coast of continental United States, not to mention Japan and other Asian countries. North Korea's gamble will have paid dividend -- but to the United States."

They have been in reach of Alaska and Hawaii for some years now.

But otherwise, good article.


2 posted on 07/08/2006 7:14:50 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ben Mugged

Very good read, credible and encouraging.


3 posted on 07/08/2006 7:21:45 PM PDT by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ben Mugged
Hey, Kimmy Boy. Just what the hell do you expect to gain or prove by trying to threaten the world's most powerful nation on Earth? You twit.

BTW, your army marches as if the troops have fire ants up their arse.

4 posted on 07/08/2006 7:24:46 PM PDT by Cobra64 (All we get are lame ideas from Republicans and lame criticism from dems about those lame ideas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ben Mugged
North Korea may have gambled -- and lost -- while playing a game of nuclear/missile chicken with the United States.

I am not convinced that NK has the A-Bomb yet.

5 posted on 07/08/2006 7:29:23 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (Make them go home!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ben Mugged

The detractors of "star wars" are looking pretty stupid (and short sighted-see ANWR) now. I hope Rove will make use of this in '06-and '08. Please make an ad of Maddy Halfbright toasting Kim Jong Ill, superimposed over the missile launch. And one of clinton vetoing ANWR drilling with signs of $3.50 gas in the back round. Talk about a target rich environment. Even the Republicans (I hope) are not stupid enough to pass on this opportunity (I hope).


6 posted on 07/08/2006 7:37:56 PM PDT by mikeybaby (long time lurker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette

Yeah, I'm not really that convinced either. But this article is great in pointing out how Kim Jong Il must have known we would have obliterated his country if his missile hit us, and therefore, he was only looking for money from the US. This, predictably, failed.


7 posted on 07/08/2006 7:40:12 PM PDT by brain bleeds red
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Ben Mugged
If one wants to stop North Korean belligerence, tie whatever terms you want the North to abide by to trade relations with China. What does China fear most, a democratically elected and unified Korea (with nuclear weapons it provided) or the cutting of economic ties with the United States? Lets call China's bluff, North Korea cannot stand without Chinese help.
8 posted on 07/08/2006 7:44:09 PM PDT by Sawdring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mikeybaby

Not to change the subject, but one should never underestimate Republican stupidity.


9 posted on 07/08/2006 7:45:03 PM PDT by OKSooner (It wasn't the black guy after all - the dutch boy did it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Jackknife

blahblah


10 posted on 07/08/2006 7:50:35 PM PDT by The Drowning Witch (Non omnes qui habemt citharam sunt citharoedi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brain bleeds red
how Kim Jong Il must have known we would have obliterated his country if his missile hit us, and therefore, he was only looking for money from the US.

During the Korean way Mao welcomed a nuclear strike by the USA on China, Mao believed he might lose hundreds of millions but that the USSR would then enter the war and give him the bomb too.

These guys do not value life as we westerners (including Russia) do.

11 posted on 07/08/2006 7:54:17 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (Make them go home!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Sawdring
Might want to consider we don't want a solution to NK. As long as they remain a threat to us, we have an excuse to keep a heavy Pacific rim military presence, including Taiwan, and keep China bottled up. As soon as they are no longer a threat, we lose our ready excuse for military presence in the area.
12 posted on 07/08/2006 7:59:01 PM PDT by Ben Mugged
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette
I don't think NK could risk it, though, because of the size of their country. One nuke could probably destroy it. But you're right, they're very cold and inhumane in their views on the sanctity of human life. Remember this General :

"If the Americans draw their missiles and position-guided ammunition on to the target zone on China's territory, I think we will have to respond with nuclear weapons," said General Zhu Chenghu.

"We . . . will prepare ourselves for the destruction of all of the cities east of Xian. Of course the Americans will have to be prepared that hundreds . . . of cities will be destroyed by the Chinese."

Link
13 posted on 07/08/2006 8:00:41 PM PDT by brain bleeds red
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Ben Mugged
You missed the photo of the
disappointed "Dear Leader":

14 posted on 07/08/2006 8:02:43 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OKSooner

I agree.
Sigh.


15 posted on 07/08/2006 8:03:19 PM PDT by mikeybaby (long time lurker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar

"The North Koreans are by nature survivalists and not suicidal."



That's what they used to say about Saddam.


16 posted on 07/08/2006 8:04:40 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cobra64

"Neither can he pretend the United States would hesitate for a New York minute to obliterate the entire North off the map in the event of a launch on an American, or allied position."




Does anyone really believe that we would drop the bomb on him even if he used the bomb? I don't think our leaders have the guts to do that, and you can be certain that he doesn't believe it.


17 posted on 07/08/2006 8:08:16 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

"The North continues to earn lucrative sums of money in exchange for selling its missile technology to a number of developing countries. Pyongyang has earned some $1.5 billion annually from the export of its missile technology and spare parts."




Unless we take him out, his a-bombs (or his a-bomb technology) will be showing up all over the world. And I don't think we're going to take him out.


18 posted on 07/08/2006 8:10:59 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ben Mugged

They misunderestimated Pres. Bush once again.


19 posted on 07/08/2006 8:13:40 PM PDT by paul51 (11 September 2001 - Never forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
Does anyone really believe that we would drop the bomb on him even if he used the bomb?

I do. In a heartbeat

20 posted on 07/08/2006 8:15:08 PM PDT by paul51 (11 September 2001 - Never forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson