Of course we don't know what the choices were on the poll questions either.
A high turnout usually favors Dems, because the unions turn out their people. So it's going to be a close elction, every vote will be important.
I note that when Schwarzenegger's numbers are at 58%, the media is not drumbeating the fact on a daily basis. If his numbers were 35%, it would be daily news on every media outlet.
I find it hard to believe that illegal immigration isn't one of the main issues. I recently listened in on a telephone town hall meeting with my Congressman, Dan Lundgren. Every caller at least mentioned immigration. I always considered Dan somewhat of a RINO but I was pleasantly surprised how strong he is on the issue. He said he absolutely opposes considering any kind of guest worker program until after a the border is secured and there is real enfocement against employers of illegals. Then if a guest worker program is started, it should be limited in numbers, they should have to go back to their own country to be eleigible, and it should be only for temporary workers, eight months max then you have to go back. He also supports ending birthright citizenship for children of illegals. He said he used to think you needed a Constitutional ammendment to do so, but has become convince the 14th Ammendment does not require it, and Congress can chage it through statute.
I really didn't think I had any reason to bother voting this year, but that changed my mind. It's a pretty safe seat, but if he doesn't cave on immigration I will go if for no other reason than to show support for Lundgren.
Actually they are, twice. #1 - English proficiency and #7 - Passing the high school exit exam. Both concerns are a direct consequence of illegal immigration. #1 is a concern for all Californians and #7 most exclusively, a concern within the increasingly large community that was founded by anchor babies.
Incidentally, here are the participation stats for the past two gubernatorial elections:
Hopefully, the 2006 general election will fall somewhere in between. Considering that the present governor was elected by only about 20% of California's eligible voters, what can the next governor accomplish at 16%? The only mandate under those circumstances is that a vast majority of the state's voters don't approve of the governor's candidacy.
There was a post here several weeks ago documentiong just the opposite in presidential elections.
"Note that Iraq, terrorism, taxes, illegal immigration aren't even on the list of top issues for Californians."
That doesn't make sense.
You're right.
We need to see the poll questions and choices.
You can tell it was a loaded poll by that last point "making sexual predators stay 2000 feet away from schools". I mean, if you asked people "are you in favor of keeping sexual predators 5,000 feet away from schools" the answer would be the same. 2000 feet is a number that is specific to some cause, I presume.
I found their website: POS.org
Rather apropos, don't you think? ;-)
(The Palestinian terrorist regime is the crisis and Israel's fist is the answer.)