Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wagglebee
I never claimed it did, I was merely stating that not all laws are valid, nor should they all be considered valid.

While I agree that there is a time and place for civil disobediance, this is not it. Working to change the laws, protesting the laws, is acceptable. Incitement to violence is not, nor should it ever be. It's wrong when the NYT does it, it's wrong when we do it.

78 posted on 07/08/2006 6:56:15 PM PDT by Zeroisanumber (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]


To: Zeroisanumber

The left is trying to change the law now. Why should it be illegal to post the names of abortionists? There is no national security reason to keep them private, this is public information. California is proposing laws that would affect other states, therefore it is unconstitutional.


79 posted on 07/08/2006 6:59:07 PM PDT by wagglebee ("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson