Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Defiant
I love your first paragraph. You haven't bought the media line, but you got your information from reading "extensively". B.S.

Instead of lawyering-up, playing the pathetic victim and demanding financing for his next cinematic effort, he should fall to his knees and thank the living God that he was picked up by us and not the happy beheaders. Maybe his survivors could have sued the military for not protecting him.

36 posted on 07/10/2006 8:07:43 AM PDT by Deb (Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: Deb
You haven't got your information from reading extensively or minimally, but by being a cold-hearted beyatch. The assumption that this guy deserved what he got is not the kind of thinking that you typically associate with freedom-loving freepers. So the question becomes, what's driving the animus by all against this guy? Why does he not get a presumption of innocence? Especially since the FBI investigated and he did in fact turn up clean. As I said, that kind of presumption of guilt is what Murtha has been criticized for.

The fact is, when this happened last year, I read about it in the papers, looked into it from a number of sources, and reviewed the summaries of the FBI's report. Everything about the guy checked out. Then it got me to thinking: how would I expect to be treated in the same situation. Suppose I went to Iraq to set up a cell phone system, to be a civilian security provider, to assist the petroleum industry, to report on the current situation outside the green zone (like Mark Steyn did) or to make a film that needs footage from Iraq, like this guy did. I could certainly understand getting caught up by mistake, as happened to this guy, and I would excuse a lot of inconvenience. But I would also expect better treatment from my fellow citizens, respectful treatment once they knew I was a citizen AND a US navy vet, a quick investigation, prompt release upon its conclusion, and maybe even an apology for the inconvenience. If that happened to me, I would be inclined to forget about the whole thing.

But, were I to suffer abuse while imprisoned, unnecessarily have to endure crappy conditions, endure an unreasonably lengthy investigation, and be held for a week even after I was cleared by the FBI, I would be inclined to seek redress for that conduct. I have obtained 6 figure settlements for my clients for far, far less of an outrage--for example, a store security guard wrongfully detains an innocent person for several hours in a basement holding room. Our society values very highly the freedom of its citizens, and before you take someone's liberty for even one minute, you better have a good reason. And even if you initially have a good reason, you better not detain them for one minute longer once you have learned facts that negate the initial suspicions.

And were this to happen to me, I would also be dismayed, but perhaps not surprised, by loudmouth wenches on the internet suggesting that I had it coming. I'd figure that they were just bigoted, or possibly not really patriots, but more like statists, or that they have some other derangement that would explain their desire for me to suffer unwarranted harm.

37 posted on 07/10/2006 1:27:20 PM PDT by Defiant (MSM are holding us hostage. Vote Dems into power, or they will let the terrorists win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson