Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge issues restraining order Ga. ID law (requiring proof like photo ID is unconstitutional burden)
AP on Yahoo ^ | 7/7/06 | Shannon McCaffrey - ap

Posted on 07/07/2006 10:46:15 PM PDT by NormsRevenge

ATLANTA - With less than two weeks to go before the July 18 primary, a judge Friday issued a restraining order blocking Georgia's voter ID law, saying that requiring photos as proof of identity is an unconstitutional burden.

Superior Court Judge Melvin Westmoreland said in a sharply worded written ruling that the Legislature doesn't have the authority to enforce the law and an amendment to the state Constitution would be required instead.

The law, he said, "unduly burdens the fundamental right to vote rather than regulate it."

The law requires that every voter who casts a ballot in person provide a valid, government-issued photo ID. The state made such IDs available throughout the state, but former Georgia Gov. Roy Barnes, a Democrat, argued in court Thursday on behalf of two residents that the law would keep poor, elderly and minority voters from the polls.

Barnes said Friday he was pleased with the ruling.

"I think what we heard today loud and clear is don't allow the vagaries of political partisanship to change the basic fundamental rights of our people," he said. "All this law did was create a bureaucracy and a burden to vote."

The state plans to appeal the ruling to the state Supreme Court.

"Democracy only works because people have trust in the integrity of the ballot box," said Republican Gov. Sonny Perdue, who signed the voter ID measure into law earlier this year. "I respectfully disagree with Judge Westmoreland, and believe that Georgia's law is not only constitutional, but a common sense, prudent protection of the election process."

The 17 forms of identification — some with photos and some without — that had been allowed in previous elections can be used at the polls for the primary, Westmoreland ruled. Voters who lack one of those IDs can also continue to attest to their identity under oath, pending further court action.

Westmoreland referred the case back to the trial judge in a case Barnes filed on behalf of two people who he said lacked the photo ID needed to vote. No further hearings were immediately scheduled.

Georgia's Republican-led Legislature first adopted a voter ID law in 2005, but a federal judge blocked its enforcement, saying it amounted to an unconstitutional poll tax. Early this year, lawmakers amended the law to make the IDs free and to ensure they are available in each of the state's 159 counties.

A separate, federal challenge to the voter ID law is also pending. Arguments in that case were scheduled for Wednesday.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Georgia
KEYWORDS: burden; georgia; issues; judge; judiciary; photoid; restrainingorder; unconstitutional; votefraud
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last
To: NormsRevenge

This idiot judge should be removed from the bench.

Is he related to Jimmy Carter?


21 posted on 07/08/2006 5:06:35 AM PDT by ZULU (Non nobis, non nobis, Domine, sed nomini tuo da gloriam. God, guts, and guns made America great.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded; Howlin
Who are the two nimrods who lack the necessary ID to vote and would have an undue burden to obtain said ID? Has anyone challenged the veracity of their claim?

I had trouble believing there were that many people without a photo ID in the first place, but after the govt decided to make them available in every county for FREE I'd really like to see the explanation of why it's an undue burden.

I'm pretty disgusted to see our former King Roy right in the middle of this.

A huge problem, in the rural counties at least, is the absentee ballots. In some of these counties, elected officials have been known to take the absentee ballots around to poor & elderly citizens, trading money or prizes for votes.

22 posted on 07/08/2006 5:53:17 AM PDT by Amelia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded
IDs, IDs, We don't need no stinkin IDs !-- apologies to the film this was in.

If we can't tar and feather some of these judges, why don't we at least try to impeach a couple each year? It seems as though if they thought they might pay a price for their actions, at least they would think twice.
23 posted on 07/08/2006 7:13:32 AM PDT by a02001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: gaspar
The Democrats simply don't want to lose their ability to cheat

Awww - you're not supposed to see through the smokescreen. ;o)

Hopefully, the Rats smokescreens are getting thinner and more of the sheeple can see thru them.

Not to mention that, once again, the RAts are saying the general public is stupid

24 posted on 07/09/2006 7:02:30 AM PDT by maine-iac7 (LINCOLN: "...but you can't fool all of the people all of the time")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson