[Howlin]

and I'll continue to point out the fact that you're joining in with a bunch of communists to attack conservatives.

Nobody has "proved" that Simcox is a "conservative." He may be the "kind" of "conservative" that turns on groups when the funds dry up, i.e., Larry Klayman.

And do we have a blind obligation to defend ALL conservatvies, regardless of their actions?

If you think we should, I await your heart-felt defense of Duke Cunningham.

I ain't waiting long though. I'm thinking you think we only shouldn't question the kind of conservatives you're associated with.

[EternalVigilance]

Gosh. Don't know if I've ever seen a poster cram that many nonsequiters into one post before. Each one with a lying inference. Wow.