Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NormsRevenge

"McElroy said he interpreted that to mean that if he wins in the appeals courts Kennedy would be willing to lift his order blocking removal."

Maybe Mister McElroy should have read a little better.

” He also said it was likely that four justices on the high court would be willing to review the case if the federal appeals court upholds Thompson's order."

Nothing there indicates that the SCOTUS would lift the block. Matter of fact, it's just the opposite.


2 posted on 07/07/2006 8:08:36 PM PDT by Bigh4u2 (Denial is the first requirement to be a liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Bigh4u2
Nothing there indicates that the SCOTUS would lift the block. Matter of fact, it's just the opposite.

Exactly. Kennedy's opinion reads so much against lifting the block (and he seems to be hinting to the lower courts, both the federal and the state, that they better get the law right) that the only explanation for this lawyer's statement is absurd spin. Justice Kennedy also says that he has considered whether the votes to grant cert in the future exist, and he thinks that they are there.
6 posted on 07/07/2006 8:43:29 PM PDT by NinoFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson