[Bommer]

do you just want to assume you're right when you're wrong just because I got the year of a ruling wrong?

I'm sorry, but I believe it was you that told me not to bash until I had the facts and I did! You see Mike, you said and I quote "California Marriage Protection Act was overturned before Arnold was governor, so I'm not sure how you lay that one at his feet." You stated that as a fact. Yet a dumb caveman like me was able to use a little device called "Google" to prove that you don't know what your talking about! A dumb caveman like me able to researched, amazing!

I would just love to pointlessly argue your "facts" as you make them up, but maybe perhaps its you that should do a little more research, instead of thinking you know what your talking about after sleeping one night at a Holiday Inn! Oh and later, ask me how much money you can save by switching to Gieco!

[longtermmemmory]

May we at least agree Angeledes is a dweeb and should not be governor?

I think we can also agree this will hurt him in the polls by telling as many people as possible about his advocating allowing marriage for homosexuals.

[MikeA]

The main point of the argument was never the date at which the marriage amendment was overturned. So I got a date wrong not pertinent to the overall discussion. You on the other hand got facts completly wrong that were central to the discussion we were having, i.e. what Schwarzenegger has done to oppose gay marriage. You claim he did nothing to stop it in San Fran. I proved you were wrong. You claim the legislature passed a marriage law and left out the VERY pertinent fact, which I doubt you knew, that Arnold vetoed it. I got a minor point that was never central to anything we were discussing wrong. Geez, looks like I still win by that scoreboard! And by the way, I found all those things by doing a simple Google search there oh Google Master!

The date is not relevent to the fact Arnold does not control what a judge decides. And further, you can in no way show he appointed that judge. So my point, wrong date not withstanding, still stands. You CANNOT lay a court ruling at Arnold's feet. On the other hand, can YOU claim your points still stand that I have knocked down entirely?? Nope, not in the least.

So anyway, keep trying to divert attention from the fact I publically bested you by obsessively focusing on a date. You have not been able to refute me on any substantive point or on anything I showed that proved you didn't know what you were talking about.

Again I say, "Try doing a little research next time."