To: CarolinaGuitarman
Your point was... underwhelming. Margulis has not attacked evolution in any way. He arguments are based on science, which cannot be said of ID. CarolinaGuitarman, I didn't say she had "attacked" Darwinism or evolution-- I said she had challenged the standard account of the ubiquity of competition in evolution, which she has with her "co-evolution" theory.
265 posted on
07/10/2006 6:57:57 PM PDT by
mjolnir
("All great change in America begins at the dinner table.")
To: mjolnir
"CarolinaGuitarman, I didn't say she had "attacked" Darwinism or evolution-- I said she had challenged the standard account of the ubiquity of competition in evolution, which she has with her "co-evolution" theory."
Co-evolution does not discount competition. She is in no way an opponent of evolution. ID on ther other hand has no scientific basis, and is purely a theological claim. There is no similarity between the two.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson