Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Manual Hand Count Requested in Busby/Bilbray Race. (Fees for Count as High as $130,000)
bradblog.com ^ | 07/07/2006 | Brad

Posted on 07/07/2006 1:37:25 PM PDT by Abathar

Late Wednesday afternoon, a "Manual Hand Count Request under the Election Recount Provision" was filed at the San Diego County Registrar of Voters office by CA-50 voter Barbara Gail Jacobson. The request is for a full manual hand count of all paper ballots and paper trails in the recent June 6th Busby/Bilbray special U.S. House election in which programmed, election-ready Diebold voting machines were sent home with poll workers for days prior to the election in apparent violation of new laws and provisions by both state and federal authorities.

As California state election code requires that a candidate be named on whose behalf such hand count requests are filed, Jacobson named Republican Brian Bilbray in her filing. Bilbray is the candidate who was announced as the winner in the race by SD County Registrar Mikel Haas.

Jacobson's manual hand count request, as filed, is posted in full here.

The breaches in security for the exceedingly hackable Diebold voting machines and the subsequent decertified use of such systems in the important "bellwether" election have prompted a number of Election Integrity organizations to declare "No Confidence" in the results of the election as reported by Registrar Haas. Haas himself has even admitted that storage of such machines in poll workers' cars cannot be considered secure as required by state and federal law.

The fees estimated for the count, to be paid by the requester, have been set at an estimated $110,000 to $130,000 by the Registrar's office. That amount, nearly a dollar per vote, is far in excess of similar counting fees charged by other County Registrars in California.

(Excerpt) Read more at bradblog.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Miscellaneous; US: California
KEYWORDS: 50th; bilbray; busby; diebold; election2006; electioncongress; electronicvoting; evoting; recount; votefraud
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last
Bwahahahaha!!! These idiots are really going to sucker enough donations from their sheep to pay for a recount at about a buck a vote! And the DUmmies think this is the best thing they can do for America now!!!

BWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

1 posted on 07/07/2006 1:37:29 PM PDT by Abathar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Abathar

CA-50 voter Barbara Gail Jacobson


Nominee for DUhhhh of the Year Award!!!


2 posted on 07/07/2006 1:42:25 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi --- Help the "Pendleton 8' and families -- http://www.freerepublic.com/~normsrevenge/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Abathar; Registered

We need to gear up the old "Sore Loserman" campaign. Registered, you got any ideas?


3 posted on 07/07/2006 1:48:22 PM PDT by Cyber Liberty (© 2006, Ravin' Lunatic since 4/98)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Evil whisper voice...DIEBOLD...HALIBURTON


4 posted on 07/07/2006 1:49:54 PM PDT by Wristpin ("The Yankees announce plan to buy every player in Baseball....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Abathar

Manual hand counts are almost ALWAYS less accurate than a machine count.

By sometimes a notoriously wide margin.

There was something like a FIVE PERCENT margin, and the vote protest agitators would have little hope of closing that gap by exposing irregularities.


5 posted on 07/07/2006 1:50:15 PM PDT by alloysteel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Abathar

Is there any chance, God forbid, the results could change? If not, spend that money democrats!!!


6 posted on 07/07/2006 1:50:58 PM PDT by BamaAndy (Heart & Iron--the story of America through an ordinary family. ISBN: 1-4137-5397-3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Abathar

$130.000..???..I'll do it for $50.000

7 posted on 07/07/2006 1:52:10 PM PDT by Doogle (USAF...8th TFW...Ubon Thailand...408thMMS..."69"...Night Line Delivery...AMMO!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Abathar

If the person requesting the hand-count is willing to shell out for what will likely be a losing cause, I have no problem with that.

That's $100,000+ this woman can't spend on Dem candidates in the general election.

Unless, of course, she received numerous contributions from other "concerned" citizens worried about whether proper tabulation had taken place. Maybe she's a straw-man for others.


8 posted on 07/07/2006 1:53:37 PM PDT by MplsSteve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin; neverdem; Calpernia; Abathar

So, she CLAIMS to have Bilbray as a her "candidate" of choice for whom she is appealing the vote.

Why, since Bilbray won, is SHE the one who is complaining about the vote?

Just what is HER agenda and HER (previous) political support?


9 posted on 07/07/2006 1:54:23 PM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BamaAndy
No way, not by that much unless there was fraud in the recount. This is pretty cut and dry, a republican won in a heavily republican district right after the idiot he ran against made the some stupid comment about "not having to show proof of citizenship to vote" while at a Latino meeting or something. No, this one is in the bag, these idiots are just doing this for two reasons only, to hear about in the paper and because they can.....
10 posted on 07/07/2006 1:54:32 PM PDT by Abathar (Proudly catching hell for posting without reading the article since 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Abathar
As California state election code requires that a candidate be named on whose behalf such hand count requests are filed, Jacobson named Republican Brian Bilbray in her filing.

Did she think she was being cute by doing this?

-PJ

11 posted on 07/07/2006 1:55:17 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (It's still not safe to vote Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Abathar
http://www.nctimes.com/articles/2006/07/07/news/top_stories/21_12_437_6_06.txt

In a Thursday phone interview, Jacobson said that while she is a registered Democrat, she would be making the same request even if a Democrat had won the election.

Uh-huh. Sure. Right.

12 posted on 07/07/2006 1:56:19 PM PDT by Libertarian444
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MplsSteve

I slipped on my trusty Acme Mental Hazmat Suit and slipped over to the Dummies site and they are all ponying up the cash to do this over there, one guy is so proud he was able to give $100 bucks to "The Cause"


13 posted on 07/07/2006 1:56:35 PM PDT by Abathar (Proudly catching hell for posting without reading the article since 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE

She is a big Dem, but she chose to do it in the winners name for some reason, I don't know why....


14 posted on 07/07/2006 1:57:36 PM PDT by Abathar (Proudly catching hell for posting without reading the article since 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Abathar
As California state election code requires that a candidate be named on whose behalf such hand count requests are filed, Jacobson named Republican Brian Bilbray in her filing. Bilbray is the candidate who was announced as the winner in the race by SD County Registrar Mikel Haas.

I smell a RAT. As the winner, Bilbray would have no reason whatsoever to request a recount. So just who is this Jacobson person?

15 posted on 07/07/2006 1:58:51 PM PDT by Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Abathar
Manual Hand Count Requested in Busby/Bilbray Race

As opposed to an automated hand count?

16 posted on 07/07/2006 2:00:27 PM PDT by RichInOC (Rich's Undeniable Truth of the Day: Stupidity is its own punishment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob

A big shot Dem, she said she would have done the same thing had the Dem's won the election also...(while her fingers were crossed I bet)


17 posted on 07/07/2006 2:01:06 PM PDT by Abathar (Proudly catching hell for posting without reading the article since 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Abathar
Here's the folks supporting this VelvetRevolution.
18 posted on 07/07/2006 2:01:48 PM PDT by TheDon (The Democratic Party is the party of TREASON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Abathar

The Rats always want to try and steal any election they lose.


19 posted on 07/07/2006 2:06:00 PM PDT by TheDon (The Democratic Party is the party of TREASON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Abathar

Oh give me a break...Bilbray won by 4 points, not .4. This isn't going to change a damned things. I'm really getting sick of these satanic Democrats calling into question every election they lose. It's now rubbed off on other countries as we've seen in Mexico and Germany and does terrible violence to the free electoral systems of democratic governments worldwide.


20 posted on 07/07/2006 2:24:01 PM PDT by MikeA (Not voting in November because you're pouting is a vote for Nancy Pelosi for Speaker of the House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson