To: gondramB
"Aside from little things like issues, I'd pick the one less likely to go nuts (or more nuts as the case may be.)"
I don't think we have to choose between liberals and nutballs.
The country is turning more right, the Demonrats are turning more left, and they lose every election.
Lets nominate a conservative and keep it that way.
64 posted on
07/07/2006 8:39:23 AM PDT by
Beagle8U
(Liberals get up every morning and eat a big box of STUPID for breakfast)
To: Beagle8U
>.Lets nominate a conservative and keep it that way.<<
That is the right thing to do.
Now, the smart thing for the Dems to do would be to nominate a moderate but other than Leiberman (who may not even hold his Senate seat, being "too moderate") they don't have a good moderate name to nominate.
72 posted on
07/07/2006 8:44:56 AM PDT by
gondramB
(Unity of freedom has never relied upon uniformity of opinion.)
To: Beagle8U
"Lets nominate a conservative and keep it that way." The only problem is that the globalist republicans are NOT conservatives.
They would be happier with the Witch than a Tom Tancredo.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson