[Jameison]

"It sounds as though you are in favor of Rudy becoming president. Am I correct about this?"

Correct.
As at now, he is the best positioned to beat whatever candidate the RATS throw up, come 2008, having bested all RATS comers in practically every poll for the 2008 presidency, carried out this year.
The conservative candidates like Allen have done considerably worse.
Of course its very early days yet, and things could change by 2008. A week is a long time in politics as they say.

Bottom line, whoever the Repubican candidate is for 2008 is going to get my vote, even if it's the snake McCain. A RATS in the White House is going to be a disaster for this country. We are still paying the price for Klinton's failure to deal with the Al Quaeda, despite repeated Al Quaeda attacks against America and Americans all over the world.

[Czar]

"Bottom line, whoever the Repubican candidate is for 2008 is going to get my vote, even if it's the snake McCain."

I've got enough trouble just with Rudy, so now you throw Captain McQueeg in for good measure. That's inflicting an awful lot of pain, Jameison.

I appreciate your candid answer. Thanks.

[You Dirty Rats]

I don't think McCain has the temperment to be President and I don't trust Giuliani.

Unfortunately I DO trust Hillary or some other 'Rat to do the wrong thing time after time.

Most importantly, we don't need a Party of passivist surrender monkeys in charge of national security. You think that nut in North Korea would be worried about what a 'Rat President would do if he nuked Guam or one of our friends in Asia? Didn't think so.

Why anyone here would not vote for the Republican nominee and instead help a Party that thinks Joe Lieberman is too far Right is beyond me. We are no longer dealing with anything resembling a loyal opposition -- we're dealing with political lunatics.

And as far as third party candidates go -- voting that way is a waste of chad. When's the nominating convention of the Reform Party? BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!