Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pictures: Exclusive first photos of Lockheed Martin F-35 JSF ahead of official roll-out
Flight International ^ | 06/07/06

Posted on 07/06/2006 7:49:16 PM PDT by nametrader

Pictures: Exclusive first photos of Lockheed Martin F-35 JSF ahead of official roll-out flightglobal.com has obtained exclusive photographs of Lockheed Martin's first F-35 Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) as it emerged from the paint shop at Fort Worth, Texas ready for its formal roll-out and naming on 7 July.

Aircraft AA-1 (pictured below), an F-35A conventional take-off and landing (CTOL) variant of the JSF, is expected to fly by late October. As a result of a redesign to reduce the weight of the F-35B short take-off and vertical landing (STOVL) variant, AA-1 is a one-off and not fully representive of the production JSF. It is being used to validate design, manufacturing, assembly and test processes for the 14 development flight-test aircraft that will follow.

Powered by a Pratt & Whitney F135 engine, AA-1 is equipped with most of the vehicle systems planned for later F-35s, including the fly-by-wire/power-by-wire flight controls and flat-panel cockpit displays. The mission systems, incuding active-array radar and 360deg infrared sensors, will be tested in later aircraft.

Assembly of the next flight-test aircraft, the first optimised-airframe STOVL F-35B, is already under way at Lockheed and partners Northrop Grumman and BAE Systems, with the aircraft scheduled to fly in February 2008. The first optimised-airframe F-35A is to fly in August 2008 and the first F-35C carrier variant in Januray 2009.

AA-1 carries the flags of the eight international nations involved in development the JSF (pictured below): Australia, Canada, Denmark, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Turkey and the UK, which is the only Level 1 partner. Lockheed and the US government are hoping the eight nations will sign a memorandum of understanding on the JSF production, sustainment and follow-on development phase in December.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Unclassified
KEYWORDS: aviation; f35; lightning; lightning2; lightningii; lockheedmartin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-134 next last
To: Strategerist

"ONE of the 3 versions is VTOL"

Nope. It's Short Take Off Verticle Landing STOVL. No verticle take off like the Harrier


41 posted on 07/06/2006 9:13:12 PM PDT by Figment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist

Sounds like an A380, only cheaper.


42 posted on 07/06/2006 9:15:30 PM PDT by appeal2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
That is the sexiest aircraft ever.

I was going to say, "nice bird", but I think you said it better.

43 posted on 07/06/2006 9:15:44 PM PDT by Not A Snowbird (Official RKBA Landscaper and Arborist, Duchess of Green Leafy Things)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: alfa6

Something else you might want to see.


44 posted on 07/06/2006 9:45:22 PM PDT by barker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: calljack
I was calibrating a Milstar test set a few years ago at A TRW facility. I had to walk through a computer lab to get to the room I need to get to. I had to be let into the room and escorted through. There were about 25 computer guys working in there. They all had to turn off their monitors even though the monitors were facing away from me. Then they all had to turn their chairs and face away from me as I walked through.

Hmm. I had a run-in with Milstar a few years ago at a TRW facility; mine wasn't quite so bad. I did have to be locked into the room with an escort, but don't recall folks having to turn away from me as I walked through the work area. I did, however, lose any media I brought in (I brought plenty for just that reason; I'd bring a new version of my code in in the morning and figured I wouldn't get the tape back later).

My escort did, however, have to turn the monitor away from me when he gave my new code a try...

45 posted on 07/06/2006 9:47:55 PM PDT by Vroomfondel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: KoRn

The internal bay can carry two 2,000 lb JDAM. The concept is to use it in the low observable configuration until air superiority is achieved. After that you add wing pylons and turn it into a bomb truck.


46 posted on 07/06/2006 10:21:33 PM PDT by USNBandit (sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: nametrader

A fine example of aeronautical pulchritude!


47 posted on 07/06/2006 10:30:27 PM PDT by sheik yerbouty ( Make America and the world a jihad free zone!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rembrandt
I do not agree. Up to this point, the 14s, 15s, 16s, and 18s have not been overly burdened. Their missions have been clear. The A-10 is mission-specific. The F-15 was air superiority, exclusively, for a number of years before later models were designed for air-to-mud. It was also looked to for nuke deliver interception. 'Multi-role' sells when the brass goes to the Hill, but much of the U.S. inventory has been mission-specific for a long time.

A lot was learned from the 50's through Viet Nam. In 1964, the USAF had tactical nuclear fighter-bombers with which to execute the air war in SEA. The F-100 and F-105 were designed to deliver a single nuclear device to a Soviet/Warsaw Pact target, then go like hell and try to survive. These aircraft were certainly capable in SEA, but a lot of adaptation had to occur. More mission flexibility in the design process would have yeilded more well-rounded aircraft.

The F-4 escaped some of the 'LeMay' vision for tactical fighter, and was a successful joint-service aircraft, just as I anticipate the F-35 will be.
48 posted on 07/06/2006 10:30:36 PM PDT by jblair (Son of a Wild Weasel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
You might also check the angle on the engine exhaust.

Frankly not the prettiest aircraft IMO.

49 posted on 07/06/2006 10:30:57 PM PDT by Chaguito
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Chaguito
You might also check the angle on the engine exhaust.

Frankly not the prettiest aircraft IMO.

That is the version for the Marines that replaces the Harrier VTOL aircraft. That's why the exhaused is vectored 90 degrees.

50 posted on 07/06/2006 10:42:12 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Rembrandt; jblair
If this is a VTOL or STOL a/c, then I personally think the West has made another mistake. The West always tries to load many mission capabilities onto one airframe. The Enemy assigns one, maybe two, mission capabilities to a given airframe.

There are three different versions. One is an airforce version that replaces the F-16 with stealth and superior flight characteristics. The second is the navy version that is designed to make tailhook landings on US carriers. The third is the marine version with STOVL capabilities to replace the Harrier. They aren't all desinged to do all missions.

51 posted on 07/06/2006 10:50:21 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: justa-hairyape
I heard a very true story about a field engineer who accidentally saw the Stealth Fighter while walking past a hanger on a classified section of an Airport in Southern California. Apparently a door was left part way open.

My father was a dentist at Lakehurst NAS from 1959-1961. One day Dad, camera in hand (the Navy was a vacation for him - go figure) was just walking around and passed by a hanger with "a hot looking jet" in it. No security, but he knew he was in a secure area, because he didn't recognize the plane (and he knew all of the then-current aircraft). And then he took a picture...and brings the film to the local drug store to have it developed!!!. 3 days later, the Navy announced the existence of the A-5 Vigilante, a Mach 2 carrier-based, nuke-capable aircraft.

The best part is that my grandfather immigrated from Russia in 1923. The same guy who still had living siblings in the Soviet Union. Great, the son of a Russian immigrant is walking around a Naval Air Station with camera in tow, taking pics of still non-public aircraft and getting the film developed at a public place. It is truly a wonder that he's not still locked up in some military prison.

52 posted on 07/06/2006 10:53:26 PM PDT by Ancesthntr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative; HAL9000; Lazamataz
Reminded me of this...

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

53 posted on 07/06/2006 11:12:29 PM PDT by IYellAtMyTV (Workday Forecast--Increasing pressure towards afternoon. Rum likely by evening.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

F22 is my favorite.


54 posted on 07/06/2006 11:17:31 PM PDT by Cobra64 (All we get are lame ideas from Republicans and lame criticism from dems about those lame ideas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Ancesthntr
It is truly a wonder that he's not still locked up in some military prison.

Wow. He got lucky. Once they make the info public, it is no longer a secret. They must have been getting ready to make that information public soon. When I talked to the person who had been debriefed, that information (existence of Stealth Fighter) was already public. Therefore he was able to tell the story. I used to worry about ever getting caught in the following situation, while working near classified material, all of a sudden a military office with a loaded weapon walks up to you and says, 'What exactly have you seen ?'. At least that is probably how it happens. What would you do in that situation ? Pull a Colonial Schultz ?

55 posted on 07/06/2006 11:25:25 PM PDT by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Recovering Hermit

Just Beautiful!


56 posted on 07/07/2006 1:02:54 AM PDT by Peanut Gallery
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: justa-hairyape

Try getting off the helicopter that just brought you back to Nellis after doing a crash recovery up range and having everyone on the helicopters getting taken in for a debriefing and a secrecy agreement. That's exciting.


57 posted on 07/07/2006 2:50:17 AM PDT by Tennessee_Bob ("Those who "abjure" violence can only do so because others are committing violence on their behalf.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: RKV

'When these dogs get into service, every other country in the world - you are behind, dudes. This bird will kick your best in the hinie and not break a sweat.'

Haven't you heard? Every other nation is building it as well!

Britain is the only tier 1 partner, but Italy, Holland, Autralia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Singapore and Israel are part of the deal. Oh, and of course Islamic Turkey, which I nearly forgot!


58 posted on 07/07/2006 3:10:31 AM PDT by Vectorian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
After years of making pilot's reward visibility a priority, it looks as though the ptb have switched directions with the F-35.
59 posted on 07/07/2006 3:52:38 AM PDT by GBA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee_Bob
That's exciting

Ahh, The stories some people could tell. Not too many stories from Area 51 and other places though. The real secure places on Permission-to-Shoot no mans lands.

Funny thing is I am just now starting to read the Dragons Fury Series. Just starting Vol 1 Chap 9. Looks like the 'Prophet's Sword' is about to be Executed. Talk about surreal. Forget making the movie. Watch it play out live on the teli.

60 posted on 07/07/2006 3:53:47 AM PDT by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-134 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson