The other day we heard on the radio that some publication printed pics and security camera information on vacation houses leased by Sec. Rumsfeld and VP Cheney.
We're not sure, but believe the publication was the Washington Post, or NYT. (If anyone else knows for sure, please clarify.) The publication argued that it was all public information, thus no harm no foul.
So my question is: How would he like it if WE printed pics of Sulzberger's home and relevant information regarding security for he and his family?
What's good for the goose....
Here's a link to an FR thread about the vacation homes of Rumsfeld and Cheney, It's a Malkin piece.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1660884/posts
Yes, the information was published in the Travel section of the NYT, and this story also caused a huge uproar. Defenders of the newspaper say they have also published deep details about the home and movements of the Clintons in Chappaqua. They also say it was all written about before, such as when these officials were searching for homes to buy in that area; however, for the location of all the officials' vacation destinations to be publicized directly before a holiday in wartime smacks of tit-for-tat over the administration's displeasure with the security breaches.
And yes, some bloggers have advocated finding the locations of NYT owner and reporters, including where their children go to school, and one was reportedly prosecuted for using the phrase "hunt them down."
Sorry not to be able to link it for you today -- very busy day. But the info is out there online. I found it by Googling.