[sig226]

There's no irrefutable evidence of anything. That's the problem. Eyewitness accounts may be all manner of inaccurate, but the NTSB's conclusion was based on their inability to prove any specific cause, so it must have been the center tank.

Bad science.

[tpaine]

There's no irrefutable evidence of a missile attack or bomb, a cargo door accident, a meteor, lightning strike, etc. Theories have been abundant but after 10 years it's long past time for all the conspiracy theorists to put up or shut up.
15 posted by Hal1950

There's no irrefutable evidence of anything. That's the problem.
Eyewitness accounts may be all manner of inaccurate, but the NTSB's conclusion was based on their inability to prove any specific cause, so it must have been the center tank.
Bad science.
20 sig226

Worse than bad science, -- it's lousy logic to conclude that anyone questioning a 'report' with so many holes in it is automatically a "conspiracy theorist".

[tpaine]

There's no irrefutable evidence of a missile attack or bomb, a cargo door accident, a meteor, lightning strike, etc. Theories have been abundant but after 10 years it's long past time for all the conspiracy theorists to put up or shut up.
15 posted by Hal1950

There's no irrefutable evidence of anything. That's the problem.
Eyewitness accounts may be all manner of inaccurate, but the NTSB's conclusion was based on their inability to prove any specific cause, so it must have been the center tank.
Bad science.
20 sig226

Worse than bad science, -- it's lousy logic to conclude that anyone questioning a 'report' with so many holes in it is automatically a "conspiracy theorist".