Froufrou, -- has it ever occurred to you that government has never been delegated the constitutional power to give "special treatment" to alcohol, tobacco and firearms? Or that what gov't might "want" is unconstitutional?
-- No level of government in the USA is empowered to "LIMIT" or "-- deprive any person of life, liberty or property without due process of law. --" [14th]
As Justice Harlan recognized:
"-- The full scope of the liberty guaranteed by the Due Process Clause `cannot be found in or limited by the precise terms of the specific guarantees elsewhere provided in the Constitution.
This `liberty´ is not a series of isolated points pricked out in terms of the taking of property; -- the freedom of speech, press, and religion; -- the right to keep and bear arms; -- the freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures; and so on.
It is a rational continuum which, broadly speaking, includes a freedom from all substantial arbitrary impositions and purposeless restraints, . . .
Prohibitive laws over-regulating alcohol, tobacco and firearms are "substantial arbitrary impositions and purposeless restraints".
The only way to make it stop is to stop denying that you're a statist.