Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dog Gone

I am thinking that AFTER a primary if a candidate pulls out, it is the same as forfeiting the election. At one time, a party could not replace a nominee who quit for personal reasons. I am trying to think of a case where that happened.


71 posted on 07/06/2006 10:44:55 AM PDT by Theodore R. (Cowardice is forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: Theodore R.

In Louisiana in 1968, the Republicans nominated a district attorney from the Baton Rouge area to challenge Sen. Russell Long. The D.A. pulled out of the race, and the Republicans did not offer a replacement candidate. So Long was unopposed for reelection. Now, I don't think the Republicans could have offered another candidate had they tried, which they did not do.


75 posted on 07/06/2006 10:48:56 AM PDT by Theodore R. (Cowardice is forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

To: Theodore R.

There have been plenty of times when the primary winner dies before the general election, and nobody thinks much about it when a replacement is named.

This is only slightly different in that DeLay made himself ineligible for election. I guess he could just shoot himself. That would make the DUmmies happy.


78 posted on 07/06/2006 10:52:02 AM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson