Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AmishDude

I can't speak to the intricacies of the law, but I can speak to common sense. I think this kind of law was put into place in order to force the parties to abide by the results of primaries. I.e., to prevent them from parachuting in a new candidate against the will of the people. Probably a Progressive Era thing.



That's a lot of what happened in Texas. This change was made back in the 70s where one party would run a place holder candidate in the primary and if it looked like the opposition may have a weak candidate in the General they'd let their place holder step down and they'd replace him/her with a better candidate.


237 posted on 07/06/2006 6:26:07 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies ]


To: deport

OK. I got the motivation, but not the historical era.


239 posted on 07/06/2006 6:30:17 PM PDT by AmishDude (First Supreme Emperor of the NAU!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson