Posted on 07/06/2006 7:35:39 AM PDT by SmithL
Locally there is already quite a bit of talk of that. And in civil court, the burden of proof is only 51% (not overwhelming evidence).
Ken Lay was guilty of either crooked dealings or negligence. Either probably puts him at liability.
They seem to be about on par for what the Left said of Reagan when he died.
The way I heard it today, is that he is going to be buried and innocent man, because he had not been setenced yet, and the whole process must be done while a person is alive. So his death prior to sentencing voiced the conviction and he's buried innocent.
The the money thing is a little odd, but it's going to make watching this play out very interesting. If Lay left everything to the wife, she's entitled to 50% of it, so the government... might..only get 50%. But the government cannot go after anything the kids may have received in the will. So a smart lawyer would have had Lay change his will to leave everything to the kids, and the government is SOL.
Of course I have absolutely no idea if this is accurate or not, but it's what I heard on the radio this morning.
Outrage is selective in this world.
This is where the double standard really gets insulting... Both stories should have been covered.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.