Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Iris7
The "decreasing middle class prosperity" statement rests on what is meant by "middle class".

Yes, usually defined as an income range.

Perhaps we can agree that the "middle class" are those persons not of "lower class",

And not of "upper class".

"Middle Class" then can not include those (whatever their income) without income producing property since they then must be "lower class".

So your theory means a shoe repair shop owner who earns $25,000 a year is middle class while a wage earner who makes $1,000,000 a year is not middle class or upper class?

That's one way to show the middle class is shrinking. Change the definition to the point of uselessness. Why not use a silly, much easier definition, like range of income?

You never did answer my question...If we returned to a gold backed dollar, do you think we could find enough new gold each year to expand the money supply enough to prevent deflation?

128 posted on 07/09/2006 6:09:27 AM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists so bad at math?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies ]


To: Toddsterpatriot
If we returned to a gold backed dollar, do you think we could find enough new gold each year to expand the money supply enough to prevent deflation?

From wikipedia, there's 155,000 tonnes mined ever and 2500 tonnes mined per year. But a more meaningful comparison might be the 8133 tonnes in official U.S. holdings and 252 tonnes mined in the U.S. each year which is 3% growth.

129 posted on 07/09/2006 6:24:03 AM PDT by palmer (Money problems do not come from a lack of money, but from living an excessive, unrealistic lifestyle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson