Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: OmahaFields

SOI3 was in his uniform. Maybe he only burned his jacket and not his pants. Though there should have been no reason he had blood on him if the affidavit is to be believed.


54 posted on 07/05/2006 5:06:14 PM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]


To: pissant
SOI3 was in his uniform. Maybe he only burned his jacket and not his pants. Though there should have been no reason he had blood on him if the affidavit is to be believed.

Didn't I2 testify that I3 threw the woman to the floor?

I think there is a lot more to the story. Remember this was just an affidavit to go after SG. I am sure they limited what they put in about a lot of the details about the other guys behavior.

56 posted on 07/05/2006 5:12:31 PM PDT by OmahaFields ("What have been its fruits? ... superstition, bigotry and persecution.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson