I think details are important. A time line can make or break a case. I just think that that one detail is probably a mistake in this document because of the overwhelming amount of information that this occured on the 12.
The neighbor makes a number of claims.
- on fire.
- lifted her white gown to her newck.
- torn her bra.
- blood flowing from between her legs.
- intense fire in the room.
- she had been turned on her face.
- lower part of her body was raised.
- hands and feet were tied.
Probable terrorist giving this report - so there may be some embellishment.
Iraq rape, killings appear as if 'studied'
http://www.kentucky.com/mld/kentucky/news/special_packages/iraq/14950779.htm
Please note: "One resident of the village of Mahmoudiyah al-Kasr al-Awsat told The Washington Post yesterday that the young woman had complained of harassment by U.S. soldiers each time she passed through an American checkpoint. The resident, Omar Janabi, said in an interview that the woman's family had taken the precaution of sending her to spend nights with a neighboring family. But the soldiers attacked the family's house during the daytime, when everyone was at home, said Janabi.
So why would the affidavit state that they were drinking on the 11th, yes, specifically the 11th. And if the attack occurred at 2:00 PM on the 12th, why would they wear black so they would not "be seen". Its screwed up, I'm telling you.