Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wideawake
They got free stock, but that free stock turned out to be worth nothing. They didn't pay for it, so any value they got for it would have been a windfall and getting nothing for it is exactly what they paid for it - an intelligent Enron employee lost not a cent of anything he had personally earned.

It wasn't "free" stock. An employer's contribution to a 401k is compensation for one's labor. So the Enron employees personally earned that stock.

In other words, they lost that part of their compensation, which they were never free to invest as they please. I call that a bum deal.

I don't know anyone who receives company stock for the employer contribution who has to hold that stock until age 50 regardless of whether they leave the company.

509 posted on 07/07/2006 7:39:11 AM PDT by freespirited (A liberal is a person haunted by fear that someone, somewhere does not require government assistance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 505 | View Replies ]


To: freespirited
It wasn't "free" stock. An employer's contribution to a 401k is compensation for one's labor.

One's salary is one's compensation for one's labor.

Stock awards are a perk.

No employer is required to provide matching funds or stock awards with a 401k plan, and any employer can choose to discontinue such stock awards or matching funds at any time.

Employers cannot by law choose to discontinue compensating employees for work performed, so clearly matching funds and stock awards are not compensation since 401k-providing employers can discontinue them at any time without penalty or liability.

510 posted on 07/07/2006 7:55:09 AM PDT by wideawake ("The nation which forgets its defenders will itself be forgotten." - Calvin Coolidge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 509 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson