Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wideawake

And you don't find the administrative change-over lockup *convenient* or *coincidental* to the time period when everything was falling apart?


408 posted on 07/05/2006 12:57:46 PM PDT by Rte66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 404 | View Replies ]


To: Rte66
Of course it was "convenient" for Enron management.

Companies in trouble will do anything they legally can to try to prop up the stock price.

However, it is disingenuous for someone to claim that they never had an opportunity to sell their Enron stock and that they had no idea there was value at risk when:

(1) They were perfectly capable of selling their shares the whole time the stock was falling from $87 to $27 and (2) they were perfectly capable of selling all the shares they owned outside of the 401k plan at any time.

Things were falling apart for a year before October 17, 2001 - and emails show that tons of rank and file Enron employees saw it happening months before the market figured it out - and they still sat on their shares.

The lockup was a last-gasp desperate move, not a sudden first sign that something might not be right.

What responsible person watches two-thirds of their savings evaporate in less than a year and still does nothing?

415 posted on 07/05/2006 1:08:04 PM PDT by wideawake ("The nation which forgets its defenders will itself be forgotten." - Calvin Coolidge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 408 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson