[BobL]

"Here in Utah among Republican Party regulars Cannon's defeat at convention and his hard push during the primary were widely seen as a double humiliation for Cannon and a strict rejection of his pro-shamesty sentiments--the spin outside of the state by administration sources and the six shamnesty supporters at FR notwithstanding."

Thanks for the verification. This was obvious to me, but others seem to have trouble with it.

Basically what the shamesty proponents are saying is that if Senator Lieberman wins his primary 56-44 over that DU clown, then the entire Democratic base now fully supports Bush on Iraq. The fact that someone as well liked as Lieberman (in fact, he's one of the few Dems respected on this site, and probably the only liberal Dem respected here) is in a fight is the BIG NEWS. The outcome is virtually unimportant.

[CWOJackson]

"Thanks for the verification."

You should go back to the Utah election night threads and read through them. Republican Utah voters were fairly well represented and they portrayed a far different picture of the situation within the race and how Utah voters viewed it...which was also apparent in the vote count.

[JCEccles]

Cannon got the message, even if the six shamnesty supporters at FR didn't. Or pretended not to.

[Soul Seeker]

Basically what the shamesty proponents are saying is that if Senator Lieberman wins his primary 56-44 over that DU clown, then the entire Democratic base now fully supports Bush on Iraq.

Bingo.

BTW, if border enforcement advocates are discredited and amnesty is sailing forward uncontested by will of the people...why are they still on these threads?

Actions speak louder then spin folks.