If your desired change to the existing laws were palatable to the general public, you could explain and clarify your position however long it took, secure in the knowledge that you would eventually win the voters over with your desirable legislation.
You aren't doing that. You are calling those who disagree with you names. Not necessary if time is on your side.
The longer Hillary care was under the public magnifying glass the less chance it had. The Democrats had to try to get it through quickly or it would never happen. I believe the Senate immigration bills are under that same requirement for quick passage.
Texasforever, you may dissagree - but this constant name calling fails to enhance your argument.
Friend I have been called a Quisling, Race traitor, BushBOT and that is just the nicer things from this crowd. If you don't like it just scroll right on past my name. Rational debate with the borderbots is a waste of time. They whine and moan about every Republican that does not bow to their demands and support a guy that forms pacs to defeat conservatives that he isn't fit to be in the same room with. They cheer on a Marxist in Mexico because they think it will force the Berlin wall they dream about every night. The names I call them are compliments compared to what I really feel they are.
Yes. Looking at it closely shows all the "hidden" loopholes to allow a stealth amnesty.