He limits the definition of "survivor" to one who survived the camps, rather than one who hid or fled, or wasn't rounded up in time. Good grief your kidding! I met a couple in NY city that hid in Poland and had 2 small children. He would sneak out at night and steal food. All their family, on both sides, died in the camps. And this yahoo thinks they're not survivors?
Yes... the fewer Jewish victims to count, the more it can be dismissed as a case of ordinary wartime suffering and anyway so the argument goes what happened to the Jews was nothing special. Every one was a victim of Nazi aggression in World War II. Of course, this means conveniently overlooking the special character of the Nazi war against the Jews and the systematic measures taken to facilitate their complete destruction. To do that, all the evidence has to be ignored.
(The Palestinian terrorist regime is the crisis and Israel's fist is the answer.)