Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Abortion of “Excess” Babies Common with IVF
LifeSiteNews ^ | 7/4/06 | Gudrun Schultz

Posted on 07/04/2006 12:38:57 PM PDT by wagglebee

 VIRGINIA BEACH, Virginia, July 4, 2006 (LifeSiteNews.com) – “Excess” babies are routinely aborted as part of in vitro fertilization techniques, a report by the Virginian-Pilot acknowledged yesterday.

The report examined the problems associated with multiple births, a common occurrence when attempting to conceive and successfully carry a child using artificial technology. The success of IVF techniques typically rely on the insertion of multiple embryos to enhance a couple’s chances that at least one embryo will successfully implant and result in a pregnancy.

Frequently, the procedure will result in more than one embryo implanting in the womb at a time, resulting in abnormally high rates of twins, triplets and quadruplets. All multiple births pose far greater risks for both mother and children. The babies are usually born prematurely with dangerously low birth weight, at risk for serious disabilities.

To avoid these risks and increase the chances of having a healthy baby, fertility clinics commonly recommend the “selective reduction” of one or more babies—which in fact simply means aborting the children tagged as less promising to make room for the baby (or babies) believed to be physically stronger. 

“In a world where debate storms on legislative floors over stem cell research and abortion, embryos are culled with quiet regularity from the wombs of women for whom fertility procedures were too effective,” wrote report author Elizabeth Simpson.

Although some fertility clinics have attempted to cut down on multiple birth rates by voluntarily placing restrictions on the number of embryos placed in the womb, such measures only result in the deaths (or indefinite storage) of left over embryos denied access to their mother’s womb.

This treatment of “surplus” embryos is a core argument against artificial procreation methods, raised by the Catholic Church and other religious and political organizations who charge that in vitro fertilization techniques are fundamentally immoral.

Read the full coverage from the Virginian-Pilot:
http://home.hamptonroads.com/stories/story.cfm?story=107004&...

See LifeSiteNews coverage of the loss of life and medical risks of IVF:

http://www.lifesite.net/features/invitro/


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abortion; cultureofdeath; eugenics; invitrofertilization; ivf; moralabsolutes; prolife; selectivereduction
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: Delphinium

Thank you too! :-) I need to make those pictures a bit smaller when I get the chance, sorry about them being so huge!


21 posted on 07/04/2006 5:47:01 PM PDT by pillut48 (CJ in TX)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: srmorton
I am the mother of twins and I honestly don't know how anyone could deal with more than two at one time!

I am a twin mom as well, and I agree. However, my brother's friends have quadruplets (they were IVF babies). They are a marvelous family - the kids are great, and the parents are my heroes.

22 posted on 07/04/2006 9:57:27 PM PDT by Mygirlsmom (This Mess is a Place!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Excellence

Thanks for your concern.


23 posted on 07/04/2006 11:10:11 PM PDT by Almondjoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Former Fetus

I'm with you 100% on this one .. I would like to see limits imposed sooner than later ... I would like to see limits on the number of embryo's created ,, possibly by requiring that the "parents" maintain them financially in a frozen state until they are implanted (or donated to another infertile couple),, this would create a large number of "ready to go" babies for couples that don't have the $20K in cash necessary for one round of IVF... hopefully that would create a self righting mechanism for this problem.


24 posted on 07/05/2006 1:04:02 PM PDT by Neidermeyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN; Coleus; nickcarraway; narses; Mr. Silverback; Canticle_of_Deborah; ...
Pro-Life PING

Please FreepMail me if you want on or off my Pro-Life Ping List.

25 posted on 07/06/2006 3:21:25 PM PDT by cpforlife.org (It cannot be emphasized too strongly that this great nation was founded...by Christians)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndMostConservativeBrdMember; afraidfortherepublic; Alas; al_c; american colleen; annalex; ...


26 posted on 07/06/2006 4:55:51 PM PDT by Coleus (Roe v. Wade and Endangered Species Act both passed in 1973, Murder Babies/save trees, birds, algae)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cpforlife.org

I so appreciate all your pings - bump (:


27 posted on 07/07/2006 4:01:10 AM PDT by .30Carbine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson