Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ansel12
Can someone explain how that was not successfully argued by the pro 2nd side.

It's my understanding that the "pro 2nd side" in this case, i.e. Mr. Miller, i.e. the plaintiff, was dead by the time this case got to the SCOTUS. Therefore, there was no one to argue the point.
10 posted on 07/03/2006 7:09:31 PM PDT by Jubal Harshaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Jubal Harshaw

"It's my understanding that the "pro 2nd side" in this case, i.e. Mr. Miller, i.e. the plaintiff, was dead by the time this case got to the SCOTUS. Therefore, there was no one to argue the point."



So there was something unusual, thanks.


15 posted on 07/03/2006 7:25:02 PM PDT by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Jubal Harshaw
It's my understanding that the "pro 2nd side" in this case, i.e. Mr. Miller, i.e. the plaintiff

Miller was not the "plaintiff", the government had appealed the case to the Supreme Court. The government was the plaintiff. But you are correct in that only the government was represented in the Supreme Court proceedings.

51 posted on 07/08/2006 7:52:45 AM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson