No, not again.
1 posted on
07/03/2006 4:18:43 PM PDT by
Dane
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
To: Dane
El Conquistador Carlos Rove strikes again!
To: Dane
"progressive candidate"
Operative word here.
No bias in this story.
To: Dane
Geeze...yet *another* case of exit polling fraud.Somebody should investigate!
To: Dane
Greg Palast is a certifiable far-left nutjob..... he has conspiracies for everything. The only conspiracy he can't seem to explain is how so many raving loonies like Greg Palast actually get paid money to write their tripe.
7 posted on
07/03/2006 4:23:38 PM PDT by
Enchante
(Keller & Sulzberger: Forget elections, WE are the self-appointed judges of everything)
To: Dane
As in Florida in 2000, and as in Ohio in 2004, the exit polls show the voters voted for the progressive candidate. The race is "officially" too close to call. But they will call it - after they steal it.So here we are, years later, and they're still saying the 2000 and 2004 election was stolen.
Geesh!
Move on, no wonder they lose elections.
8 posted on
07/03/2006 4:23:52 PM PDT by
dawn53
To: Dane
The only exit poll that I saw that had Obrador winning was the one from the PRD itself all of the others said Calderon
10 posted on
07/03/2006 4:24:25 PM PDT by
GeronL
To: Dane
No, I don't really have a point here.
11 posted on
07/03/2006 4:24:50 PM PDT by
martin_fierro
(<-- Once shouted "Migra!" in a crowded taqueria)
To: Dane
I haven't read the whole article, but I'm going to take a stab here and guess they didn't mention the Washington state, huh?
12 posted on
07/03/2006 4:26:22 PM PDT by
AmishDude
(First Supreme Emperor of the NAU!)
To: Dane
14 posted on
07/03/2006 4:28:50 PM PDT by
Gritty
(What is going on is a sustained assault by Mexico on U.S. sovereignty - Mark Steyn)
To: Dane
We've said again and again: exit polls tell us how voters say they voted... And, as we've seen agains and again, Lefties will SAY anything to get elected. I wonder how many people in the USA try to fool exit polls by walking into any precinct, then turning around and walking out, and then answering an exit poll as if they had voted, just to give the appearance that their candidate is winning. Now, more than ever, the appearance of winning is more important during the contested election phase that will follow all future elections.
-PJ
To: Dane
The should've locked up Rove when they had the chace.
heh heh heh
16 posted on
07/03/2006 4:30:38 PM PDT by
SmithL
(The fact that they can't find Hoffa is proof that he never existed.)
To: Dane
To: Dane
It was a Bush/Bilderberg conspiracy to erase the borders, dontcha know????
/sarcasm
Let the games begin!
To: Dane
Wooooo... Man, I thought he was going to go back and re-look the Kennedy/Nixon vote.
To: Dane
"As in Florida in 2000, and as in Ohio in 2004, the exit polls show the voters voted for the progressive candidate. The race is "officially" too close to call. But they will call it - after they steal it."
Yes, we always elect candidates based on exit polling not by actual VOTES.
22 posted on
07/03/2006 4:37:08 PM PDT by
headstamp
(Nothing lasts forever, Unless it does.)
To: Dane
Palast wrote this article even before the polls closed. He made sure this would be printed if Calderon won.
To: Dane
The al Gaurdian is not happy!
24 posted on
07/03/2006 4:37:46 PM PDT by
mathprof
To: Dane
"As in Florida in 2000, and as in Ohio in 2004, the exit polls show the voters voted for the progressive candidate"
Groan!
Not more BS from The 'Assassinate President Bush" Guardian again.
When is The Guardian going to simply get to their one true destination in life, and officially become part of the Daily Kos moonbat site?
Don't see any difference between them right now.
25 posted on
07/03/2006 4:38:02 PM PDT by
Jameison
To: PJ-Comix
DUmmie Implosion Alert!
26 posted on
07/03/2006 4:38:42 PM PDT by
RedRover
To: Dane
Calderón Derangement Syndrome
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
