Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dave Elias
The Chain of Command is responsible for EVERYTHING that is done by it's troops. A Private is supervised by a Corporal. A corporal is supervised by a Sergeant, and so on. This guy was a PFC. He should have been under direct supervision of an NCO.

If this guy was a mental case, he shouldn't have been permitted to have a weapon, PERIOD.

If this guy was intoxicated, he shouldn't have been in possession of a weapon, PERIOD.

This is a Chain-of-Command case. Where were they? Why wasn't an NCO there to beat this guy over the head and reinforce the point that his actions are not condoned (if the accusations are true).

When I was an NCO, we constantly monitored our troops, on and off duty. We were responsible for everything our troops did, or did not do.

It's called Leadership. That's what the NCO Corp stands by, regardless of the branch of service.

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

99 posted on 07/03/2006 7:37:42 PM PDT by Sarajevo (Life is a sexually transmitted disease. -R. D. Laing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]


To: Sarajevo
When I was an NCO, we constantly monitored our troops, on and off duty. We were responsible for everything our troops did, or did not do.

It's called Leadership. That's what the NCO Corp stands by, regardless of the branch of service.

You already answered some of my questions. I would assume that accountability is built into all SOP.

117 posted on 07/03/2006 11:53:17 PM PDT by La Enchiladita (God Bless Our Troops...including U.S. Border Patrol, America's First Line of Defense)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson