Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge in cross case praised by colleagues (Judge gets a little PR help)
UNION-TRIBUNE ^ | July 3, 2006 | Greg Moran

Posted on 07/03/2006 2:40:58 PM PDT by TheDon

It will very likely be in the first line of any account of the four-decade-long career of federal Judge Gordon Thompson Jr.: “The judge who in 1991 ordered that the Mount Soledad cross had to be moved.”

...........

All of this was triggered by Thompson's Dec. 3, 1991, ruling. In that 40-page opinion, Thompson methodically described the history of the crosses, how the cases came to be and laid out the law he was bound to follow.

In the end, he wrote that that “binding constitutional precedent compels” a finding that the crosses on public land are unconstitutional.

The decision rests on a clause in the state constitution guaranteeing free exercise of religion “without discrimination or preference.”

Thompson cited cases in both state and federal appeals courts on the meaning of the clause. Taken together, they lead to the conclusion that under state law, “a government body is conducting itself unconstitutionally whenever it so much as appears to be preferring one religion over another.”

The cross at the war memorial on city land is a “powerful sectarian symbol,” Thompson wrote, and the city's efforts to describe it as a war memorial are nothing but a “pretext” to obscure its historic purpose and significance.

The decision was immediately criticized – then-county Supervisor George Bailey called it “asinine”

.............

(Excerpt) Read more at signonsandiego.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: crossburner; taliban
No doubt the judge wishes Greg wouldn't "help" so much. A rather pathetic attempt.
1 posted on 07/03/2006 2:41:02 PM PDT by TheDon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TheDon
The decision was immediately criticized – then-county Supervisor George Bailey called it “asinine”

This guy got it right!

2 posted on 07/03/2006 2:55:15 PM PDT by calex59 (The '86 amnesty put us in the toilet, now the senate wants to flush it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheDon
Jimmy Stewart as "George Bailey".. The decision was immediately criticized – then-county Supervisor George Bailey called it “asinine”
3 posted on 07/03/2006 3:29:17 PM PDT by tflabo (Take authority that's ours)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheDon

The judge in this case is clearly a ghoul.


4 posted on 07/03/2006 4:09:39 PM PDT by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson