Skip to comments.
Amnesty for Insurgents? Yes.
The Washington Post ^
| 06/30/2006
| Charles Krauthammer
Posted on 07/03/2006 1:56:35 PM PDT by raj bhatia
We had two political objectives in going into Iraq: deposing Saddam Hussein and replacing his regime with a democratic government unthreatening to the region and strategically friendly to the United States. The first objective proved far more easy to achieve than anticipated. The second has proved far more difficult than anticipated
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-24 last
To: raj bhatia
The price would still be half of what they are paying at the pump in Europe.
21
posted on
07/03/2006 4:08:41 PM PDT
by
RobbyS
( CHIRHO)
To: raj bhatia
I would rather have a free market
22
posted on
07/03/2006 4:11:28 PM PDT
by
GeronL
To: RobbyS
Actually the civil war analogy is quite scary. There was no reconciliation for decades after the civil war. I guess the only prescription for ethnic divisions to heal is time. It would not be a big deal but for the fact that our troops are in the cross fire.
To: Leto
Then in the "real world" I would suggest that we take no prisoners. Otherwise our soldiers will have to be detectives and lawyers on the battlefield.
24
posted on
07/03/2006 4:57:22 PM PDT
by
Coldwater Creek
("Over there, over there, We won't be back 'til it's over Over there.")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-24 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson